The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Origins and Evolution of the Nicaraguan Insurgencies, 1979-1985


Article # : 11300 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1986  7,237 Words
Author : Michael Radu
Michael Radu, a research associate at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia, specializes in African and Latin American affairs.

       The involvement of the United States in Nicaragua's current civil war threatens to obscure the indigenous sources of that conflict, pushing its nature into the shadow of domestic ideological and partisan debates. Arguments over Washington's or Moscow's role in Nicaragua have wildly distorted and grossly oversimplified the very complex historical and sociological antecedents of this war. This essay is an attempt to provide a fuller picture both of what is behind and what is at stake in the Nicaraguan civil war.
       
        Like most civil wars, Nicaragua's is far bloodier than a conventional conflict between two regular armies under the control of national governments pursuing their separate interests. Nicaragua is a society tearing itself to pieces. Families are torn by conflicting loyalties which supersede blood ties while former comrades are murderously divided. Neither class antagonisms nor political history satisfactorily explains the Nicaraguan civil war--the political culture of Nicaragua and the circumstances of the revolutionary victory of July 19, 1979, serve far better. Indeed, while claiming to represent "the people" or "the masses" of Nicaragua, the ruling Sandinista national Liberation Front (FSLN) comprises cadres whose origin is overwhelmingly middle or upper-middle class. Even a cursory examination of the background of the FSLN cadres demonstrates that "objectively, the Sandinismo of the FSLN proper…was never a lower-class phenomenon. It was, instead, the ideology of a group of young people, mostly middle- or upper-class in origin.' The insurgents' political leaders come from a similar background. On both sides in this conflict, most followers are from "the people," that is, from among the marginal urban youth in the case of the FSLN; from traditionalist peasantry in that of the largest insurgent group, the ... (1994 of 46101 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy