The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Responsibility in Science and in Decisions About the Use or Non-Use of Technologies


Article # : 11326 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 5 / 1986  13,604 Words
Author : Gerard Radnitzky
Gerard Radnitzky is professor of philosophy of science at the University of Trier, Trier, West Germany.

       The "wealth" of a nation consists primarily in its human capital, in the knowledge that its professionals generate, in the creative talent and the diligence that make possible the generation of new knowledge, in the entrepreneurial spirit, managerial skills, professional ethics, and so forth. The early gatherer-hunters possessed virtually the same natural resources available today. The major difference between them and modern man is the amount of knowledge that we possess with regard to how resources can be transformed into desired good (Gwartney 1985). Economic history shows that it has been, above all, two interacting factors that brought a diversity of goods within the budget constraints of the mass of population: the wedding of science and technology at the end of the nineteenth century together with the market order. When private rights to innovations are protected, a market order not only provides a strong incentive for entrepreneurs to innovate, but also a premium reward for innovations that improve the material living standard of the masses. The whole history of liberal capitalism is one of extending the luxuries of a minority ever wider to become everyday conveniences of growing majorities. As F. von Hayek points out, "The proletariat which capitalism can be said to have 'created' was thus not a proportion of the population which would have existed without it and which it degraded to a lower level; it was an additional population which was enabled to grow up by the new opportunities for employment which capitalism provided" (Hayek 1954:151).
       
        Institutional arrangements such as the market order, insofar as they are efficient, constitute an epistemic resource. Since technology policy and science policy play an increasingly important role, an industrialized nation has to answer the question: "How can our ... (1990 of 84763 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy