The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

From Crisis to Abundance: Oil Strikes Back


Article # : 10046 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1986  1,322 Words
Author : Richard H. Fink
Richard H. Fink is an associate professor of economics at George Mason University and president of Citizens for a Sound Economy.

       Six years ago if someone had predicted oil prices would fall below $15 per barrel in 1986, they likely would have been laughed out of town. Starting with the 1973 embargo, some conservationists, no-growth advocates, and certain politicians contended that the world was running out of oil. Regardless of OPEC, these seers contended, energy supplies should be rationed, speed limits should be lowered, synthetic or alternative fuels needed to be developed, and prices had to be regulated. The energy crisis had become "the moral equivalent of war."
       
        As pessimistic as these predictions were, they were not the most gloomy scenarios offered about world oil. Some analysts even broached the possibility of $100 per barrel of oil. Although prices stabilized somewhat in the early part of this decade, the price per barrel was still well over $30. Furthermore, energy "experts" predicted prices would resume their upward march. Billions were spent on developing synthetic fuels, and the federal government created the framework of a gas rationing system that would have cost taxpayers $2 billion a year to administer.
       
        An underlying theme in these arguments was that the free market could not be relied upon to allocate resources. Market critics contended that "greedy" corporations and OPEC nations made normal considerations inapplicable. It was the responsibility of government to step in and ensure that the world ran out of energy in an equitable manner.
       
        Rules without age: supply and demand
       
        Needless to say, the "era of limits" is no more. What happened to change ... (1993 of 7990 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy