The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Commentary on William Folz's Article


Article # : 10068 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 4 / 1986  1,365 Words
Author : Mortan A. Kaplan
Morton A. Kaplan is Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and editor and publisher of The World & I.

       Professors Foltz has presented a splendid account of the role of Africa in the world, the history of American involvement in the area, and the strategic importance of Africa in terms of American interests. The areas in which I would take issue with him are perhaps minor. Professor Foltz accepts the conclusion of a recent Rand report that Ascension and Diego Garcia islands "in conjunction with adequate air refueling assets, [would permit] the United States to conduct significant logistic operations almost anywhere on the globe." He then adds: "This would represent, of course, an extreme case, but it does point up that rather than proliferation of integrated military bases, what the United States--or any global power--needs is friendly access, refueling and overflight arrangements with well-placed ports and air fields."
       
        I am willing to concede that in certain minor affairs this conclusion may follow. Bases, however, are very important, although they may be so politically counterproductive as to be contraindicated. I seriously doubt that "friendly access, refueling, and overflight arrangements" would permit the United States to do much more than to show the flag in the Middle East against any Soviet operation. The concentrated shipments from nearby supply depots that basing permits would be absent. Thus, the facilities of which Professor Foltz writes might permit the United States to provide marginal assistance to a beleaguered government fighting an internal uprising. In the absence of a local ally with considerable staying power, the military capability of the United States to influence political changes in Africa is quite small except when the popular and institutional base that supports the government or a revolutionary group is minimal. For instance, I believe that it would be relatively easy to support a revolution in ... (1996 of 8432 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy