The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Making Sense of Stalin


Article # : 10167 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 8 / 1986  6,556 Words
Author : Alexander Shtromas
Alexander Shtromas is a reader in politics in the Department of Politics and Contemporary History at the University of Salford, United Kingdom.

       STALIN AND THE SHAPING OF THE SOVIET UNION
       Alex de Jonge
       New York: William Morrow & Co., 1986
       542 pp., $19.95
       
        Many traps await anyone bold enough to under take a study of Stalin. One is easily tempted to treat him as a paranoiac whose acts were both unnecessary and irrational from any politically or ideologically coherent point of view. One could accept uncritically the influential views on Stalin of his former associates, Trotsky, and Bukharin as the prominent historians Isaac Deutscher and E.H. Car have done. Trotsky thought that Stalin was "the outstanding mediocrity in the party," and Bukharin claimed that Stalin was "not interested in anything except power." He achieved that power, Trotsky argued, through his domination "of an impersonal bureaucratic machine. . . which had 'created him,'" and used him as a champion of a thus newly created privileged caste of bureaucrats.
       
        Alex de Jonge has happily avoided these temptations. His Stalin is a rational and careful Bolshevik politician, who knew exactly what he wanted and who pursued his goals with remarkable farsightedness and consistency. De Jonge demonstrates that Marxism gave the Bolsheviks "a monopoly upon the truth" which meant that for them "every thing was permitted." They saw themselves as an "enlightened minority acting on behalf of the majority ignorant of its best interests… It behooved them, in the interests of humanity, never to relinquish their grasp. There could never be any question of 'consensus politics'… [T]here could and can be no question of permitting a diversity of political opinion or seeking a popular mandate… ... (2000 of 39438 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy