|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Foreign Aid Does More Harm Than Good
| Article
# : |
10348 |
|
|
Section : |
Current Issues
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1986 |
3,053 Words |
| Author
: |
James Bovard
James Bovard is an associate policy analyst for the Cato
Institute and has written on foreign aid for the New York
Times and the Wall Street Journal. |
In the recent discussions over the effects of Gramm-Rudman-mandated budget cuts, much concern has been voiced over the effects of cuts in foreign aid on various Third World countries. However, reducing our foreign aid is one of the nicer things the United States could do for many of the poor around the globe.
Our thinking on foreign aid has long been sentimental and simplistic. Foreign aid has been judged by Western intentions, not by Third World results.
In fact, our aid often is the coup de grace to struggling poor families abroad. In Indonesia, the government confiscated subsistence farmers' meager plots for irrigation canals financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID). In Mali, farmers were forced to sell their crops at giveaway prices to a joint AID-Mali government project. In Egypt, Haiti, Jamaica, and elsewhere, poor farmers have seen the prices for their own crops nosedive when free U.S. food was dumped onto their country's markets.
Since 1946, the United States has given more than $146 billion in humanitarian aid to foreign counties, including over $10 billion in 1985. Despite providing oceans of aid, America has fewer friends and less respect abroad now than it had 20, 30, or 40 years ago. Many of those countries that received the most aid are now in the worst shape.
Foreign aid projects occasionally turn out well--but the great majority are either ineffective or positively harmful. Generally, American foreign aid primarily strengthens oppressive regimes, allows governments to avoid correcting their mistakes,
... (1998 of 19161 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
