The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The 22nd Amendment Should Be Repealed


Article # : 10350 

Section : Current Issues
Issue Date : 12 / 1986  2,651 Words
Author : Dan Peterson
Dan Peterson is executive director of the Center for Judicial Studies, a think tank based in Washington, D.C., that publishes Benchmark, a bimonthly journal on the Constitution and the courts.

       "Nothing appears more plausible at first sight, nor more ill-founded upon close inspection, than a scheme...of continuing the Chief Magistrate in office for a certain time and then excluding him from it, either for a limited period or forever after." Alexander Hamilton wrote these words in 1788 to defend the decision by the Founding Fathers not to include in the Constitution any limitation on the number of terms a president could serve.
       
        In the years right after World War II, however, having had the chance to look back upon the handiwork to Franklin D. Roosevelt during his four terms in office, Congress and three-fourths of the state legislatures disagreed. The 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, limiting each president to only two terms, was passed by Congress in 1947 and ratified by the states in 1951. Though the amendment seemed "plausible at first sight" in reaction to the reign of Roosevelt, it remains "ill-founded upon close inspection." The founding Fathers, as usual, were more adept at constitution-making than were their progeny. The 22nd Amendment should be repealed.
       
        Now is a good time to reconsider the issue. The end of the second term of one of the most popular presidents in recent decades is visible on the horizon. There are those who pine for his continuation in office, and Representative Guy Vander Jagt (R-Michigan) has publicly proposed repeal of the amendment. This is only the second time since the amendment was passed that the two-term limitation actually would require a sitting president to refrain from running again. The amendment first applied to Dwight D. Eisenhower, but the recentness of its adoption, and the absence of any conspicuous desire on Eisenhower's part to seek a third term, made serious ... (1993 of 15846 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy