The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Grand Strategy Behind Renewed Sino-Soviet Relations


Article # : 10357 

Section : Current Issues
Issue Date : 12 / 1986  2,052 Words
Author : Richard C. Thornton
Richard C. Thornton is a professor of history and international affairs at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

       By now it should be obvious to even the most casual reader that the Sino-Soviet conflict is over. The big question is: How far will the rapprochement go between the two communist giants? Are we witnessing the first steps toward a return to the alliance relationship of the early 1950s, or is each power using an improvement in relations as a means of achieving other objectives? Is it a reversal of the early 1970s when the United States held the center position? Then, as the United States moved toward rapprochement with China, Moscow was forced to improve relations with Washington to avoid being odd-man out. Today, China appears to hold the center position. Are Chinese leaders calculating that improved relations with Moscow will force concessions from Washington?
       
        Current Soviet Strategy and China's role
       
        Soviet grand strategy since 1979 has been focused on the Middle East and designed to prepare for the moment when Iran could be brought into its political orbit--either as a client state or as a "neutral." Indeed, Iran, in the throes of a long and inconclusive war and on the precipice of internal instability, presents Moscow with a greater geopolitical opportunity than did the prospect of communist revolution in China 40 years ago. And the rewards of success are potentially greater. If Moscow could bring about a pro-Soviet reorientation of a post-Khomeini regime and thereby obtain leverage on global petroleum flows (for such a reorientation would impact upon the entire Persian Gulf, including Saudi Arabia), the energy underpinning of the U.S. position in both Europe and Asia would be fundamentally damaged. Moscow would move into the position of energy broker for those dependent upon Middle Eastern petroleum and potentially become the ... (1997 of 13279 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy