The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Thoughts on Democratic Change in a Divided Nation


Article # : 10370 

Section : Modern Thought
Issue Date : 12 / 1986  7,926 Words
Author : Chong Lim Kim
Chong Lim Kim is a professor and the director of the department of political science at the University of Iowa. An earlier version of this paper was given at a conference co- sponsored by The World & I and Korean PWPA.

       No other issue is more salient in the politics of South Korea than the issue of the democratic reforms. This is true today as much as it was in the past, reflecting the persistence of widespread public aspiration for democratic rule. Seldom has the ideal of democracy ever been denied in the public pronouncements by the leaders of the past regimes. While they systematically thwarted democracy in their actions, they nevertheless tried to justify their undemocratic rules in the name of democracy. When it became clear that their rule deviated drastically from what we commonly understand as democracy, they called theirs "the Korean style" democracy.
       
        Nearly forty years after the formation of the Republic, democracy still remains an elusive goal. Despite the persistence with which the Korean people have pressed for it, its attainment does not seem anywhere near. Why is it that democracy has failed to take root in Korea?
       
        Democracy as a political process
       
        Robert Lane's definition of democracy serves as a useful starting point. He states that "democratic politics embraces standard elements: competitive elections, a legitimate opposition, a relatively free (officially uncensored) press, and protection of minority rights" (Lane 1986, 383). Competition and institutional safeguards that permit its full plays are essential to democracy. The freer the competition between leadership groups in elections and in the market place of ideas and influences, the more democratic the process is. Competition produces three important political effects. It discourages any form of monopolistic control of power by a leader or an institution, making it possible to ... (1993 of 50769 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy