The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Sciences Now Have Masks on Them


Article # : 10597 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 2 / 1986  9,994 Words
Author : Colin M. Turbayne
Colin M. Turbayne is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Rochester, in Rochester, New York. His best known work is The Myth of Metaphor. This selection is reprinted by permission of the University of South Carolina Press.

       In this piece I try to do two things. First, in order to give content to the distinction between using metaphor and being used by it, I offer some illustrations of actual victims of metaphor from the history of science. My main examples are Descartes and Newton, two scientists who first invented or developed procedures for describing the process of nature and then confused ingredients of their procedures with the process they described. Second, in order to find a method that may help me to avoid the errors of these giants, I preset their methods in some detail.
       
        More than others in modern times, Descartes and Newton have influenced the attitudes of subsequent scientists, philosophers, and ordinary people, so that our vision of the world remains largely a complication of the Newtonian and the Cartesian. Moreover, they were both philosophers of science as well as scientists, having left us not only their own descriptions of nature but also higher level accounts of what they thought they were doing in making these descriptions. Finally, in spite of their mistaken beliefs about what they thought they were doing, their methods worked.
       
        In different degrees Descartes and Newton were aware and unaware of what they were doing. To some degree they did not confuse the ingredients of their procedures with the process they described. But they also thought that many ingredients of procedure were duplicated in the process. They thus added qualities to the world, thinking that these ingredients were not just inventions or decisions in the realm of procedure but actual discoveries of fact. In this respect they were like cooks who first use a recipe with great skill and then added the pages of their recipe to the ... (1971 of 58726 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy