|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Kamikaze Economics
| Article
# : |
10729 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
1 / 1986 |
2,302 Words |
| Author
: |
Pete Du Pont
Pete du Pont is currently editor of IntellectualCapital.com.
He has served as Republican senator and governor of Delaware. |
The rising flood of imports from Japan, Canada, Taiwan, South Korea and Brazil is causing a big protectionist drive in Congress with more than three hundred trade bills. Pete Du Pont, Chairman of the Hudson Institute and former governor of Delaware analyzes the long-term effects of Protectionism.
This fall, protectionism--the imposition of stiff trade barriers--became a political cause celebre. In the last few weeks, the protectionist fervor has waned considerably, thanks to the continuing strength of the United States economy and to President Reagan's courageous efforts to resist policies that would undermine America's prosperity and growth. But we can be sure the protectionist rhetoric will return next year, as Democrats have pledged to make the alleged need for protectionism a major issue in the 1986 congressional campaigns. Perhaps now, in this calmer interim, is a good time to examine the wisdom of such restriction of trade.
To be sure, the driving political forces behind protectionist legislation are understandable. And, undoubtedly, there are very real problems. Some industries and firms are losing their ability to compete in the world market, causing great hardship to some working families. Some exporters are facing illegitimate barriers to the export of their goods and services. Politicians are right to wish to help change this situation.
But protectionism is not the answer. Indeed, it would worsen the very problems it promises to fix. But the call for protectionism will become less shrill only when an alternative set of policies is put forward; policies that will create new jobs while recognizing the special problems of the
... (2000 of 14095 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
