The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Ontological and Theological Bases of Pluralism


Article # : 10754 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 1 / 1986  7,519 Words
Author : Robert P. Scharlemann
Robert P. Scharlemann is professor of Religious Studies at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Va. This paper is published by permission of Paragon House.

       Plurality is a contemporary fact with which discussions of unity or commonality need to begin. This is not to say that heterogeneous aspects of the human race and human thinking were not known before; but it is to say that that heterogeneity plays a much larger role in our consciousness than was the case when communication was more restricted than today. Not only is that the case with our consciousness of heterogeneity; it is also true that recent philosophy and theology, particularly that part of it influenced by dialectical theology of the 1920s and by Heidegger's reading of the ontotheological tradition in Western thought, has been explicitly concerned with providing a categorical place for otherness, for the "not" and the negative, which cannot be accommodated in a metaphysics of identity. These developments put questions of unity and quests for community into a framework in which unity needs to be sought not with the intention of producing uniformity but with the hope of finding a community which prevents diversity from being mere chaos and makes heterogeneity creative instead of destructive of human understanding. Broadly viewed, the last two centuries seem to have produced more diversity than unity: not only has the unity of ontotheological metaphysics been broken, the sciences have also become, since the nineteenth century, independent of philosophy as well as of theology, and, within the particular sciences, branches have developed that tend toward separation from their own roots. Institutions and intelligence thus lead toward diversity and isolation. No longer does philosophy provide the basic concepts upon which the sciences draw. Rather, the empirical sciences in the main fashion categories, when they need new ones, from the language of everyday understanding; they do not draw upon articulated cosmologies or metaphysical systems. Hence, the pluralism of the modern world includes both a consciousness of ... (1995 of 45270 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy