|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Amazing Neurological Tales
| Article
# : |
10972 |
|
|
Section : |
BOOK WORLD
|
| Issue
Date : |
6 / 1986 |
2,530 Words |
| Author
: |
Arthur Quinn
Arthur Quinn is chairman of the Department of Rhetoric at the
University of California at Berkeley. "San Francisco Bay" is a
fragment from his new book Czeslaw Milosz: An Introduction to
His Work, co-authored with poet Leonard Nathan. A guide to
the abbreviations used in this piece appears on page 355. |
A London reviewer of an earlier of an earlier clinical tale by Oliver Sacks made an apparently serious charge against him. It couldn't have happened the way Sacks said it did. Perhaps Sacks fibbed to make his tale more appealing, perhaps he was deluding himself--but the tale was simply not true.
There was in this denunciation the faint whiff of sour grapes. Sacks, after all, has become an immensely successful writer. Most of the present collection of essays, for instance, were first published in intellectually fashionable magazines like The New York Review of Books. Sacks has become for neurology what Stephen Jay Gould is for paleontology or Lewis Thomas for general medicine, someone who can transform the technicalities of his science into best-sellers that still command the respect of our intelligentsia.
There is one fundamental difference between Sacks and the other two, though, and this difference is one legitimate source of suspicion. Gould and Thomas usually write essays; Sacks writes stories. Worse, he openly admits that these stories are intended to be read like The Arabian Nights, for he is seeking in his patients' case histories new fables, new myths, new symbols for our scientific age. Such an admission could raise questions in the mind of even the most docile reader: should we care whether or not these fables are completely truthful? Does Sacks himself feel free to introduce the equivalent of flying carpets when he thinks a tale would be improved by them? Questions of this kind the London reviewer thought crucial in dismissing Sacks.
Of course, despite their obviousness, these questions still might not be the most important
... (1997 of 14886 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
