|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Whose World Is It, Anyway?
| Article
# : |
10983 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
6 / 1986 |
2,211 Words |
| Author
: |
Jane S. Shaw and Richard L. Stroup
|
Around the world, as the ills of common ownership are increasingly recognized, a surge of "privatization" is taking place. People are beginning to understand that private ownership encourages efficiency and spurs national prosperity. Until recently, however, nearly everyone drew a line when it came to environmental matters.
Conventional wisdom assumes that when it comes to protecting wildlands, reducing pollution, and providing for natural amenities, the government must always be in charge.
Today that blanket assumption, is being questioned. In his environmental message to Congress earlier this year, President Reagan stated that efficient use of the nation's resources, "guided whenever possible by free markets rather than centralized controls, will work to promote environmental health, economic productivity, and fiscal responsibility." He urged the expansion of efforts "to create markets and to consider market-like management practices" in government regulations.
The latest annual report of the President's Council on Environmental Quality offers abundant evidence that the private sector provides more natural protection than most people realize.
This emerging recognition that the private sector can protect the environment sometimes better than the government should not be surprising. It reflects Aristotle's observation that commonly owned property is often neglected, while privately owned property is well taken care of. But only recently have economists systematically applied this understanding to the natural
... (1968 of 13887 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
