The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Perspectives on the Defensive Transition


Article # : 11055 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 6 / 1986  6,702 Words
Author : Alvin M. Weinberg and Jack N. Barkenbus
Alvin M. Weinberg is a Distinguished Fellow and Jack N. Barkenbus is a political scientist at the Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

       A Strategic Stalemate
       
        Nuclear arms negotiations during the 1980s have borne no fruit despite the public pronouncements of both Soviet and American leaders favoring radical reductions in their nuclear arsenals. The absence of progress in moving toward this goal can be, and has been, attributed to many factors-most frequently to the intransigence of one or the other superpower. Unless some "give" in superpower positions is forthcoming, the arms race is destined to continue.
       
        Perhaps the key area where "give" or accommodation must be found is in ballistic-missile defense. Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has insisted that Soviet agreement to reduce the number of its strategic nuclear weapons is contingent upon the United States' agreeing to ban all "purposeful" research, development, and testing on advanced, or space-based, ballistic-missile defense technologies. President Reagan, whose advocacy of advanced ballistic-missile defense led to the creation of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), popularly known as "Star Wars," has steadfastly refused to compromise his policy of full speed ahead when it comes to defensive technologies. This fundamental disagreement constitutes the primary arms-control impasse today.
       
        Soviet disapproval of the SDI is not surprising. The Soviet achieved rough nuclear parity with the United States through massive expenditures an offensive nuclear arms during the 1970s and 1980s. The prospect of this formidable force being negated by American technology and engineering prowess is not a pleasant one for Soviet leaders. Moreover, Reagan's radical shift in nuclear doctrine, emphasizing the virtues of defense, caught ... (1999 of 42234 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy