The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Who Owns America?: Decentralization and Technology in the 1930s


Article # : 11409 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 11 / 1986  4,839 Words
Author : Edward Shapiro
Edward Shapiro is professor of history emeritus at Seton Hall University. He is completing a book on the Crown Heights (Brooklyn, New York) riot of 1991.

       Reconciling industrialization with Jeffersonian democracy has been a major concern of America's leading thinkers and imaginative writers. Some, such as Thoreau, believed the two to be incompatible and fled to a variety of Walden Ponds where they could lead lives uncontaminated by the grosser aspects of factory production. Others, including Theodore Dreiser and Edward Bellamy, concluded that decentralization was inconsistent with the demands of mass production and would have to be replaced by strong leadership and political collectivism if the nation was ever to secure the economic abundance promised by mass industrialism. Most Americans, however, have been unwilling to repudiate either decentralization or industrialism. American history is cluttered with efforts to reconcile economic, social, and political decentralization with the collectivist implications of modern industrialism. From the beginning of American manufacturing there has been the dream of using technology to create a decentralized industrialization.
       
        The case for economic collectivism was presented most forcefully in the 1930s. That collectivism was the wave of the future was not so much argued as assumed by The Nation and New Republic, the nation's leading political and social weeklies; and the majority of the country's most prominent intellectuals, including John Dewey, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Edmund Wilson, debated not the desirability of collectivism but merely what version should be adopted. And yet not all American intellectuals during the 1930s were so pessimistic about to the future of individualism and decentralization or so despairing of the possibility of reconciling industrialism with Jeffersonianism.
       
        During the 1930s a group of decentralist intellectuals ... (1997 of 31288 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy