The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Writer and Society: Coincidence of Opposites?


Article # : 11535 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 10 / 1986  5,685 Words
Author : Virgil Nemoianu
Virgil Nemoianu is professor of English and comparative literature at the Catholic University of America. Among his books are The Taming of Romanticism (Harvard, 1985) and A Theory of the Secondary (Johns Hopkins, 1989). He and Robert Royal have just edited a collection of essays, Canons at John Benjamins (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).

       THE IMITATING ARTIST
       
       We often hear complaints about the scandalous effects of literary and artistic activity in modern society. Such complaints are not new. Plato, as we all remember, put severe limitations on acceptable literary forms and themes and wanted to banish poets from the city in the name of progress toward and maintenance of the good society. For over two centuries the Puritans endeavored to defeat theatrical art in England, and they achieved a measure of success under Cromwell's Commonwealth. The early Christians disfigured ancient Greek statuary, placing the good in opposition to the beautiful. Non-religious literature found only grudging toleration in the Catholic Middle Ages, and Nikilai Gogol suppressed his last work on the advice of an Orthodox priest. Other religions dealt even more harshly with artistic creativity. Even in the liberal heyday of bourgeois society, Flaubert, Baudelairem, Oscar Wilde, and Daniel Defoe all ran afoul of established moral beliefs. The secular totalitarianisms of the French Revolution, of Nazi Germany, of communist Russia or Cuba where much more decisive in their bannings, burnings, and exterminations of inconvenient poetry and poets, artists, and art. In America Robert Penn Warren finds that poetry is "Subversive of the status quo" and expresses social alienation. What do al these cases have in common and in what way are they justified?
       
        The answer to the first half of the question is not difficult to give. Any society and any regime confident of their justness and secure in their sense of the good will find literary and artistic creativity an irritant, even a skandalon. These are activities that do not fit in with human order. They partake of irrationality and randomness; ... (1996 of 34840 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy