The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

A Formula for Rapprochement With Khomeini's Iran


Article # : 11631 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1986  1,672 Words
Author : Amos Perlmutter
Amos Perlmutter is professor of political science at American University and is the author of thirteen books dealing with the role of the military in politics, strategy and the Middle East. He is the author of The Life and Times of Menachem Begin and is the editor of the Journal of Strategic Studies.

       The history of the U.S. response to the Khomeini regime in Iran is a history spotted with mistakes, stubbornness, and near-disaster. Clearly, no American strategy has yet been devised to battle fundamentalist Islam on ideological grounds.
       
        The Iran-Iraq war is more than a personal struggle between two charismatic leaders, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and President Saddam Hussein. It is war by Shi'ite fundamentalists trying to rally other Islamic Arabs around their cause. They are fighting not only Sunnis but also the forces of secularism, modernity, Westernization and Christianity, not to mention Zionism.
       
        In that sense, the ayatollah and his mullahs are conducting a surrogate war against the West, a continuation of a war that began with the Iranian revolution and the administration of Jimmy Carter. Obviously, Khomeini cannot declare a direct war against the United States, but he can battle the West and modernity in a surrogate manner by continuing the bloody battle against Iraq no matter what the cost, as well as by supporting, encouraging, and instigating Shi'ite terrorism against the West.
       
        Carter and his advisers chose the worst possible approach to Khomeini and his regime. First, they failed to adequately support the Shah; then, they tried to support the heirs of Mossadegh, whom the United States itself helped out in 1953.
       
        During the tortuous hostage crisis, Carter attempted to deal with the secular and Marxist opposition rather than negotiate directly with Khomeini. The president remained chained to his rose garden, clinging stubbornly to an ... (2000 of 9863 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy