The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Pornography, Privacy, and the Bias of Media


Article # : 11656 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 9 / 1986  4,598 Words
Author : Ernest van den Haag
Ernest van den Haag, recently retired as John M. Olin Professor of Jurisprudence and Public Policy at Fordham University, is currently a distinguished scholar at the Heritage Foundation. This is a revised version of a paper first read in January 1990 at a conference on "The Ambiguous Legacy of the Enlightenment" held at the Claremont Institute in Claremont, California, to be published in a forthcoming book.

       In a democracy, the government depends on the consent of the governed. It can be ousted by a vote and must allow the opposition freedoms of speech, print, and assembly - which can be used to persuade voters to oust it. Hence, wherever there is democracy, there is a free press - a press free to report whatever different editors, reporters, and owners want to report, and free of any government control. A free press is an essential part of democracy, and democracy is necessary and sufficient for freedom of the press. No dictator could survive a free press; therefore no dictator tolerates it.
       
        No wonder then that, on the whole, a free press favors democracy, even though in every democracy there are papers that do not. In democratic Germany before Hitler, there were some pro-Nazi papers; in the United States, we have the Daily Worker, a communist paper; in democratic France and Italy, communist parties run major newspapers and influence others. They use the freedom granted them by a democracy to undermine it in favor of a communist dictatorship that would abolish all freedom.
       
        Note here, in passing, that the major media in the United States are less closely and pervasively linked with political parties than they are elsewhere, where the partisanship of at least some major media is often taken for granted, and one can reach objective conclusions only be reading several papers.
       
        Note further that in the United States the First Amendment to the Constitution explicitly guarantees that "Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech or of the press." By various means, this guarantee has been extended to the states. There is similar ... (1995 of 26907 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy