The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Why We Need Trade Legislation Now


Article # : 12948 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1987  2,424 Words
Author : John Heinz
John Heinz is a Republican U.S. senator from Pennsylvania.

       A reporter asked me not too long ago, "Senator, are you a protectionist?"
       
        I responded, "No, I'm a retaliationist."
       
        Unfortunately, that question both misses the point and does a disservice to the issue and to the Congress. Instead, we should seek agreement on what the problems are with the current trading system, what solutions are in the United States' interest, and how to legislate solutions effectively.
       
        That kind of discussion is difficult, however, because of the myths that get in our way. I believe there are three of them.
       
        Myth 1: Free trade prevails
       
        The first myth, the biggest one of all, is that the world trading system is based on free trade. That is utterly wrong. A 300-page rebuttal of this commonly held myth, prepared by the U.S. trade representative (USTR), provides clear evidence that countries are getting away with economic murder by ignoring the law of comparative advantage.
       
        Japan, for example, in protecting its infant industries for more than 20 years by keeping all kinds of competitors out, in effect provided a large subsidy that protected companies could use to enhance their research, development, and production engineering. With that advantage they could leapfrog their competitors' technology and engineering in a way that Adam Smith and other free-trade economists never ... (1932 of 14155 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy