The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

India and Pakistan: Getting Down to Brass Tacks


Article # : 12953 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1987  2,271 Words
Author : Sumit Ganguly
Sumit Ganguly is associate professor of political science at Hunter College, City University of New York.

       The dust clouds have just begun to settle in the trackless wastes of the Rajasthan desert in the wake of postindependence India's largest peacetime triennial military exercise. However, as the eerie stillness returns to the parched plains, many questions continue to haunt the minds of those interested in the future of the troubled subcontinent. Though the Indian military exercises, Operation Brasstacks, and the Pakistani response seemed to be pushing the two countries toward yet another war, the chances of one actually occurring are remote. To fully comprehend why an outbreak of war is unlikely, what politico-military forces underlay this exercise, and what the events bode for the security of the region, it is necessary to delve into the historical background of the Indo-Pakistani relationship.
       
        Batter thy neighbor
       
        India and Pakistan emerged as independent states in 1947 from the breakup of the old British India. Despite last-minute British attempts at forging some element of unity between the two principal protagonists of Indian and Pakistani nationalism, the Congress Party and the Muslim League, the two groups chose a parting of the ways. Furthermore, the British transfer of power to the two nascent states was neither bloodless nor tranquil. In fact, shortly after the transfer of power the two states went to war over the state of Kashmir.
       
        Nominally independent, but actually under British tutelage (under the aegis of the doctrine of paramountcy, by which a native prince recognized the supremacy of the British Crown), Kashmir had a Hindu monarch, a Muslim-majority population, and a common border with Pakistan. As the leaders of the ... (1993 of 14446 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy