The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Rule of the Misfits: Ridicule in the Politics of Nietzsche and Machiavelli


Article # : 12990 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 5 / 1987  4,301 Words
Author : Robert Eden
Robert Eden is professor of political science at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia and recently published a monograh on Nietzsche and Max Weber

       Rather than postpone your gratification, I shall skip the preliminaries and get down to what you want to hear, namely, what is wrong with Ronald Reagan. To appreciate what a misfit he is, as I shall indicate, you need only turn to those connoisseurs of the absurd, Machiavelli and Nietzsche. It should be clear to everyone by now that President Reagan does not give a tinker's damn about what matters most: I mean the things for which men and especially presidents are praised and blamed by cognoscenti like ourselves. It would not offend our standards of fitness were he simply ignorant. The true misfit so eludes our standards as to defy the understanding upon which those standards rest. Reagan succeeds not by superior aptitude, but merely by being what he is. To put the monstrosity crudely, what is wrong with Reagan is his happiness, the happiness of a "natural." I trust this example to capture your attention for the question I propose to discuss: why the natural political man does not fit, or, to be more precise, appears as a misfit, in the politics of Machiavelli and Nietzsche.
       
        No knowledgeable reader will deny that Nietzsche's use of ridicule is closely intertwined with his "heresy in morality," his revaluation of "pagan, master morality, virtu." What will doubtless provoke argument is the further claim that Nietzsche's derision makes the natural political man appear a misfit. The evidence seems to confute this claim. Clearly, Nietzsche blames "morality as timidity," for clouding the reputation on princely men, and forcing them to labor under opprobrium, so that we (and eventually they) mistake their natural health for illness or worse:
       
       We thoroughly misunderstand the beast of prey and man of prey (for example, Cesare Borgia), we ... (1994 of 25639 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy