|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
George Washington: Too Good to Be True?
| Article
# : |
11875 |
|
|
Section : |
BOOK WORLD
|
| Issue
Date : |
8 / 1987 |
2,867 Words |
| Author
: |
Marcus Cunliffe
Marcus Cunliffe is professor of history at George Washington
University. |
GEORGE WASHINGTON
The making of an American Symbol
Barry Schwartz
New York: Free Press, 1987
250 pp., $22.50
Was George Washington perfect? If so, how could he have been, unless (unlikely?) he were a saint, or (blasphemous?) a god? If, on the other hand, Washington had faults and limitations, what were they? Did his contemporaries spot these weaknesses? If not, why not? If they were aware of his blemishes, did they pretend not to notice?
Those are questions that come up in every serious discussion of the man who, in the words of Henry Lee's famous obituary tribute, was "first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen." Our ancestors, of course, were readier than we are to believe in the possibilities of human greatness. The twentieth century is credited with inventing the "debunking" biography. The previous century tended to follow the rule of de mortuis nil nisi bonum - speak nothing but good of the dead. The tradition of biography they had inherited stressed the virtues of the person under review. Sexual or other possible scandals were ignored.
In such a tradition, no American hero has benefited more than George Washington. The pattern of pious anecdote was set even during his lifetime and given popular shape within a few years of his death n the little biography produced by "Parson" Mason Locke Weems. Weems, for example, bequeathed to posterity the immortal story of the hatchet and the cherry tree, as well as the vignette of
... (1994 of 17810 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
