The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Will the Stalemate Ever End?


Article # : 11894 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 8 / 1987  3,234 Words
Author : Joseph J. Sisco
Joseph J. Sisco is a former deputy undersecretary of state for political affairs (1974-76) and partner in Sisco Associates, an international management consulting firm.

       For months, stalemate has been the mark of the Middle East and the Gulf - in Lebanon, in the peace process, in the Iran-Iraq War. While the situation in the region is fluid, the changes have been more tactical than fundamentally strategic. At best, the outlook for the short term is for a continuation of the impasse rather than a significant breakthrough.
       
        Let us look first at Lebanon. The ill-fated Israeli invasion of Lebanon was a catalytic agent that brought changes in Lebanon and in the region, and not for the better. The United States has lost ground in Lebanon, but the criticism leveled at Washington for its involvement should be seen in perspective. U.S. diplomacy in large measure was responsible for getting the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which had long become in effect a state within a state, out of the country. It was unsuccessful, however, in getting all Israeli and Syrian forces to withdraw. But it was not the concept of a peacekeeping force, made up of units of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy, that was basically flawed. Peacekeeping was only intended to buy time for diplomacy.
       
        What was needed was an in-depth political initiative and bringing U.S. and Western influence to bear on the Lebanese to restructure their government, whose composition was based on the narrow confessional frame of the Compact of 1943. Given the factional strife, such diplomacy might not have worked. But the United States would at least have been seen as trying to bring about a new Lebanon based on the realities of the internal forces within the country, in which the Maronite supremacy could no longer be maintained. When the United States was forced out of Lebanon, U.S. primacy gave way to Syrian ... (1984 of 19599 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy