The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Impact of the Iran-Contra Affair


Article # : 11898 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 8 / 1987  2,620 Words
Author : Tareq Y. Ismael
Tareq Y. Ismael is professor of political science at the University of Calgary. He has published more than 12 books and many articles on Middle East affairs. His latest book is entitled International Relations of the Contemporary Middle East (Syracuse University Press, 1987).

       From the revelation of the Iran-Contra affair to the bravado of its Persian Gulf patrols, U.S. policy in the Gulf has raised serious questions about the credibility, indeed the incredibility, of U.S. foreign policy. Analysts and pundits have focused on the issue primarily in terms of image management, but the issue of impact is a far more serious matter.
       
        Since the outbreak of the Iraq-Iran War in 1980, the United States has maintained an official policy of neutrality. Its only direct involvement, aside from calls for an end to the conflict, was to supply intelligence of questionable quality to the Iraqis. Throughout the war's seven years, the United States was actively involved in "Operation Staunch," the campaign to block Western arms sales to both Iraq and Iran. The campaign involved applying diplomatic pressure on foreign governments to persuade them not to get involved in the conflict. Staunch was also part of a larger U.S. policy to isolate nations accused of backing terrorists.
       
        Iran, whose radical supporters in Lebanon are holding American hostages, was the target of most of the U.S. efforts. This policy was warmly received by America's Arab allies, as it was designed to choke off Iran's supply of arms and thus increase security in the region. In fact, in October 1986, less than one month before news of U.S. arms sales to Iran became public, Secretary of State George Shultz, in a speech to a meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), criticized the Soviet Union for not doing enough to stop arms shipments to Iran. Shultz said, "The Soviets have not acted as forcefully as we in moving to block arms to Iran....We wish they would do ... (1906 of 15947 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy