The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Supremacy of the Presidency in Defending National Security


Article # : 11942 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 8 / 1987  5,253 Words
Author : Bruce Fein
Bruce Fein is a constitutional and international lawyer as well as a journalist.

       The emergence of the United States as a global power in the aftermath of World War II precipitated numerous clashes between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government over national security. The president's authority to deploy troops abroad to fulfill NATO commitments, President Truman's seizure of a private steel mill during the Korean War, the Bricker Amendment, the Vietnam War and Pentagon Papers litigation, the War Powers Act, and President Carter's unilateral revocation of the Taiwan Defense Treaty are illustrative. Contemporary national security disputes between President Reagan and Congress swirl around covert action, SALT II, the 1972 ABM Treaty, and the testing of nuclear or antisatellite weapons.
       
        The major reason for the recent proliferation of national security contretemps among the three branches of government is the stress between the Constitution's separation of powers and the imperative of executive branch supremacy in an age of ubiquitous confrontations with the Soviet Union. Speed, energy, secrecy and continuity of policy - the indispensable ingredients of enlightened national security policy - are the earmarks of the presidential office, not the Congress or the Supreme Court. Consequently, the Constitution needs alteration to endow the president with exclusive authority over national security matters, subject only to congressional impeachment for abuses of power. Moreover, the two-term limit on the president established by the Twenty-second Amendment in 1951 should be repealed. And when the president acts for genuine reasons of national security, his actions should be shielded from judicial challenge by private parties.
       
        The United States attained its independency by revolting ... (1994 of 34418 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy