The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

U.S. Policy in the Gulf: A Second Look


Article # : 12073 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 12 / 1987  3,148 Words
Author : Frederick W. Axelgard
Frederick W. Axelgard is a fellow in Middle East studies at Georgetown University and author of the forthcoming study Iraq: The Gulf War and the Struggle for Legitimacy.

       "Should the United States be taking Iraq's side in the Gulf war?" During 1987, this question has gained currency as a mechanism for criticizing U.S. military and diplomatic initiatives relating to the Persian Gulf. Like most rhetorical ploys, this query glosses over facts and incorporates hidden assumptions to facilitate arrival at a predetermined point - in this case, to argue that the United States really has no business deploying men and equipment in the dangerous setting of the Gulf.
       
        But has the United States taken Iraq's side in its war with Iran? And is it automatically wrong for the United States to identify with Iraqi interests and objectives" The conventional wisdom that underpins most criticism of current U.S. policy in the Gulf would answer both questions with a firm "yes." In both cases, though, this answer would be wrong, as a closer examination of the complex realities in the Gulf will show.
       
        The prevailing American and international perspective on the Iran-Iraq war is hopelessly distorted. It is preoccupied with Iraqi and Iranian attacks on maritime targets in the Gulf and the formidable Western naval presence deployed to contain the effects of this so-called tanker war. But the war between Iran and Iraq is first and last a ground war. The offshore conflict is but a sideshow against what has happened (and surely will yet happen) onshore. More than seven years of bloody offensives, counteroffensives, bombings, and missile attacks have resulted in upwards of one million casualties and damages totaling hundreds of billions of dollars for the two sides. This horrific fallout completely overshadows the losses incurred in the four-year-old tanker war. Further more, it is a foregone conclusion that the course of the ... (1999 of 19065 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy