The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Second Thoughts on an Acid-Rain Bill


Article # : 12205 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1987  1,592 Words
Author : S. Fred Singer
S. Fred Singer, Visiting Eminent Scholar at George Mason University and former director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Program, is a pioneer in unmanned space science. His early work included study of primary cosmic radiation and the discovery of the equatorial "elctrojet" current in the Earth's ionosphere. He also proposed to NASA the manned mission to Phobos and Deimos now referred to as the Ph-D Project.

       Congress is at it again. The 100th Congress is pushing for an acid-rain bill, a "tough" piece of legislation that virtually mandates expensive retrofits of flue-gas scrubbers to existing coal-fired boilers and further tightens automobile emissions to nearly impossible standards.
       
        However, recent scientific evidence indicates that the efficacy of these approaches is very much in doubt. Even if more emissions reductions led to corresponding decreases in rain acidity and ecological impacts - by no means sure - is it worth the cost? Or is the bill simply a billion-dollar solution to a million-dollar problem, as its opponents claim? That question has to be addressed by a cost-benefit analysis, so far nonexistent.
       
        The scientific chain between emissions and acid rain consists of three links: It requires knowledge about the emission of polluting gases into the atmosphere, the acidity of precipitation, and the ecological effects on soils and water. The evidence for all three can best be described as confused and confusing.
       
        For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been saying for several years that emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) have decreased significantly, by 24 percent since the passage of the 1970 Clean Air Act. While that is still the EPA position, a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report released in March 1986 claims instead a 20 percent increase in SO2 in the Eastern United States between 1970 and 1980. The NAS report dutifully records its disagreement with the EPA and explains, rather unhelpfully, "These differences undoubtedly arise from the different assumptions employed in deriving the estimates." With ... (1996 of 9703 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy