|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Syria After Assad
| Article
# : |
12209 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
2 / 1987 |
3,206 Words |
| Author
: |
Daniel Pipes
Daniel Pipes is director of the Foreign Policy Research
Institute in Philadelphia and editor of Orbis, its quarterly
journal. His most recent book, The Long Shadow: Culture and
Politics in the Middle East, has just been published by
Transaction Books. |
Recent photographs of Hafez Assad, the strongman of Syria, show him gaunt and sickly. Indeed, Assad has been ill since late 1983, and his health, judging by pictures, shows a steady deterioration. This raises questions about Syria when Assad dies. Who follows him and what are the consequences?
For Syrians, it is a question of particular importance. Assad has transformed their government. When he came to power in 1970, the country had experienced two decades of almost annual coups d'etat. No ruler had established himself securely and the country suffered from a weak international position. Assad ended this instability and weakness, imposing strong leadership through a police apparatus, providing continuity of rule, and making Syria a leading actor in Middle East politics.
From what one can tell from the outside, Assad has anointed no successor; when he dies, a number of leading figures will contest the right to rule. If this occurs, there is a good chance that his whole apparatus of repression will collapse. Syrian politics would then revert to their old ways, as officers stage coups and factions proliferate.
Alienating the Sunnis
An understanding of the political dynamics of Syria - and the likely prospects after Assad - means grappling with that country's ethnic politics. Other considerations - economics, conflict with Israel, ties to the Soviet Union - matter too, to be sure, but not so much as the fact that Assad and almost all of the present leadership are members of a small and traditionally scorned religious minority, the
... (1993 of 19228 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
