The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Let the States Decide


Article # : 12334 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 1 / 1987  2,579 Words
Author : Bruce Fein
Bruce Fein is a constitutional and international lawyer as well as a journalist.

       Since the Great Depression and the inauguration of President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, the vast majority of public policymakers and voters have held an unreflective conviction that problems are best addressed by Congress and the president on a nationwide basis rather than by individual states embracing variegated approaches.
       
        The idea of federalism - that is, a preference for independent state policy-making and sovereignty in lieu of nationwide rules ordained by Congress, the president, or federal regulatory agencies - virtually disappeared from political debate during the heyday of President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society program. In the 1960s, the federal government became the dominant policy force in a broad spectrum of fields traditionally subject to state control: manpower training, welfare, medical care for the impoverished or aged, education, housing assistance, local development of blighted areas, and voting laws. The federal government, Johnson and his colleagues tacitly assumed, was uniquely endowed with the wisdom and financial resources to eliminate poverty or other untoward conditions in society.
       
        However, evidence accumulated in the aftermath of the Johnson presidency casting grave doubt on that assumption. Federal manpower training programs proved exorbitantly costly, and only a few obtained permanent employment. The fundamental causes of poverty seemed untouched by federal welfare assistance, while the number of illegitimate births, teenage pregnancies, and female-headed households among the poor mushroomed. The costs of medical care for the aged, the indigent, and others, skyrocketed, far outpacing the rate of inflation. Federal education expenditures produced no gains and some apparent loss in student ... (1990 of 17339 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy