The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

South Africa Flexes Its Economic Muscle


Article # : 12352 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 1 / 1987  1,803 Words
Author : Sanjiv Prakash
Sanjiv Prakash is a print and television journalist based in the Washington, D.C. area.

       With world outcry against South Africa's apartheid policies reaching a fervent pitch, it is natural to expect that the bulk of the criticism against the Botha regime would originate from the black African states. Both President Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia and Prime Minister Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, for example, have tirelessly rallied world support against Pretoria. For the past 12 months, beginning with the British Commonwealth heads of state meeting in Nassau, the Bahamas, in October 1985, the call for broad economic sanctions against South Africa has rapidly accelerated. At the Nassau summit, 49 countries which were once part of the British Empire issued a call to the Western industrialized nations, especially the United States, to use their influence to economically ostracize South Africa in an effort to force that nation to renounce its apartheid policies.
       
        The call that originated during that seven-day meeting has since snowballed into a global consensus for punitive sanctions against South Africa. The United States originally greeted the hue and cry from Nassau without much enthusiasm; the White House and the State Department preferred to back a policy of "constructive engagement." With congressional and public opinion in the United States coming down squarely against South Africa, though, the administration gradually came to accept sanctions as part of its overall policy toward South Africa. The British government continues to balk at levying sanctions, labeling them as "unwise and unnecessary."
       
        With most Western nations - who account for nearly 68 percent of South Africa's trade - taking the passive route, either out of domestic political concerns or national self-interest, the brunt of the nonviolent war of words and ... (1993 of 11267 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy