The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Stephen Gould's Intellectual Dilemma


Article # : 12383 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 1 / 1987  6,975 Words
Author : John Caiazza
John Caiazzza was formerly assistant to the president of Brown University and has written extensively on ethical and political philosophy.

       Stephen Gould of Harvard University is well known as a paleontologist who has written extensively on science, evolution, culture, and politics. His monthly column in Natural History magazine has a wide audience, having been collected in no less than four books. Through these books, several other books, and television appearances, Gould's opposition to creationism, his somewhat heterodox account of evolution, his left wing politics, and, not least, his devotion to baseball have become known to a wide general audience. Gould's fame has grown further through his involvement in several well-publicized controversies as well, including the creationism case in Arkansas, the role of the Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin in the Piltdown hoax, and the validity of the new evolutionary field of sociobiology.
       
        In all of Gould's writing, two main themes are present, one scientific and the other political. Scientifically, contrary to the creationists and Teilhard, Gould holds the naturalistic view of evolutionary biology, that Darwinian adaptation explains fully the origin of life and the human species. Politically, his opposition to those who argue that man's inherited nature influences his behavior shows his devotion to the left wing concept of equality of condition as the primary standard of social justice. What I will argue is that these two points of view are contradictory, and that the contradiction indicates the inability of evolutionary naturalism to uphold a consistent social ethic.
       
        Evolution And Nature
       
        It is often said that Darwin's mechanical theory replaced Aristotle's teleological view, but what this really means is not often discussed. Darwin's ... (1998 of 43088 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy