|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
'Convergence' Diplomacy Is Our Best Course
| Article
# : |
12509 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
7 / 1987 |
3,878 Words |
| Author
: |
Peter Duignan
Peter Duignan is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. |
How should Americans react to the South African situation? Clergymen call for sanctions. Students demand "divestment" by American universities and business interests. Militants agitate for revolution.
A form of inverted American chauvinism interprets all the world's evils in terms of the real or supposed wrongs committed abroad by American investors and spies. According to this interpretation, South Africa - or, for that matter, Iran, Chile, or Greece - would speedily become happy and contented democracies if only the Elders of Wall Street were to cease their plotting. This American ethnocentricity has many other forms. It assumes, for instance, that a system of franchise and political organization functioning well in the United States would be equally successful in a deeply divided, multiethnic, and multiracial country like South Africa.
South Africa is condemned for what is often overlooked elsewhere. A double standard is applied that criticizes South Africa for oppressing its people but does not attack African or other states that do as bad or even worse.
On any objective scale that ranks the "badness" of regimes, South Africa would not rank anywhere near the top. In a list of the world's "worst" governments, South Africa would obviously rank below the fanatic Khmer Rouge in Cambodia for tyrannizing its people.
All communist states oppress and exploit their people more than South Africa does. The record of forced labor, imprisonments, killings, and enforced population movements of Ethiopia, the Soviet Union, East Germany, Vietnam,
... (1998 of 23333 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
