The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Pluses and Minuses of Foreign Investment in the United States


Article # : 12514 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1987  3,565 Words
Author : Wiliam C. Freund
William C. Freund, chief economist emeritus of the New York Stock Exchange, occupies the New York Stock Exchange Chair in Economics and International Business at the Graduate School of Business of Pace University in New York City.

       When the giant Japanese semiconductor firm Fujitsu announced plans to pay $220 million to acquire 80 percent of Fairchild Semiconductor, Commerce Secretary Malcolm Baldrige and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger appealed to the president to stop the deal. They argued that we should not allow the Japanese to take over an essential American defense facility and make ourselves dependent on the goodwill of a foreign nation. Lost in the rhetoric was the fact that Fairchild was already owned by Schlumberger Limited, a French company. Apparently, Americans are more sensitive to Japanese than European ownership. The Fairchild merger was called off.
       
        The shoe was on the other foot when the U.S. oil giant Amoco recently bid for ownership of Dome Petroleum, a Canadian oil company. Canadians are no less emotional when it comes to foreigners buying their companies. There was much debate about whether Canadian oil companies as big as Dome should be allowed on the international auction block. The issue became highly political when the liberal party campaigned for a Canadian rather than foreign takeover of Dome. American capital was put on notice that it was not welcome.
       
        International buyouts are becoming commonplace. In the decades from the 1950s through the 1970s, acquisitions were mostly by U.S. companies expanding abroad and becoming multinational. Again, the shoe is on the other foot, with foreigners keeping the investment pot boiling here.
       
        Recent examples of foreign acquisitions in the United States include the $2.8 billion cash purchase of Celanese by the German chemical giant Hoechst, the $1.3 billion takeover of Big Three Industries by ... (1996 of 21536 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy