The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

History and Class Consciousness


Article # : 12654 

Section : Modern Thought
Issue Date : 6 / 1987  6,309 Words
Author : Lee Congdon
Lee Congdon writes regularly on modern literature. He teaches eastern European history at James Madison University.

       When Marx died in 1883, he left an ambiguous theoretical legacy. During his youth he had come under the hypnotic spell of the great idealist philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), but after emigrating to England in 1849, he paid increasing attention to the natural sciences. As a consequence, his theory of revolution moved between two poles; when it was not a philosophical summons to action, it was a scientific promise of success. For understandable reasons, he never achieved a synthesis, leaving it to his friend and collaborator Friedrich Engels to interpret his true intentions. In books such as Anti-Duhring, Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy and Dialectics of Nature, Engels played down the mature Marx's residual idealism and defined "orthodox Marxism" as the universal science of nature and history. That science taught, he declared, that in advanced industrial societies a large, impoverished proletariat would, in the fullness of time, rise up in victorious revolt against the ruling bourgeoisie. It could not be otherwise. The communist future was guaranteed by the operation of economic laws that were extensions of the "dialectical" laws of physical nature; they governed historical development by the continuous production and resolution of conflicts, or "contradictions."
       
        That being the case, the Marxists of the Second International (1889-1914) attributed scant significance to human consciousness and will. There were, of course, exceptions. Georges Sorel, the quixotic French engineer who eventually joined the French far Right, insisted that Marxism derived its importance not from its ability to predict the future, but from its power to inspire revolutionary action. And Kantian Marxists always placed greater emphasis on moral imperatives than on scientific certainties. But by and large ... (1997 of 39713 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy