The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

What Is Analytical Marxism?


Article # : 12656 

Section : Modern Thought
Issue Date : 6 / 1987  4,966 Words
Author : Steven B. Smith
Steven B. Smith is an associate professor of political science at Yale University and has published widely on French Marxism.

       One of the more striking features of contemporary academe has been the development of "analytical Marxism," a hybrid of analytical philosophy and Marxism. It is no different in character from a host of other attempts to combine Marx with major figures or movements of culture, for example, Freud and psychoanalysis. Analytical Marxism participates in the fashionable tendency toward eclecticism. But what distinguishes analytical Marxism is a political amnesia, ignoring the problems for which Marx has been most famous.
       
        At one time, those subscribing to Marxism did so because of their commitment to a particular sort of social change. Marxists believed that alienation or exploitation was the central feature of the liberal capitalist order, which could be corrected only through the purgative influence of violent revolution. Analytical Marxists, by contrast, are less interested in substantive commitments to Marx's social vision than with Marxist logic or methodology. Though previous Marxist theoreticians were concerned with general questions of logic or methodology, they did not permit this to become their central focus.
       
        Thus the term analytical has nothing to do with any particular doctrine attributed to Karl Marx but instead emphasizes the problem of clarity. In the Anglo-American world, Hume addressed the issue first. Empiricists (and later positivists) demanded proper standards of clarity, plausibility, and scientific adequacy. Empiricists accused Marx of an obscurantism and metaphysical obtuseness that were the result of his German philosophical heritage. Karl Popper's famous attacks on Marxism in The Open Society and in The Poverty of Historicism were regarded for many years as the decisive refutation of Marx from a broadly ... (1991 of 31991 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy