The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Were Any Laws Broken in the Iran-Contra Affair?


Article # : 13134 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 11 / 1987  4,678 Words
Author : David B. Rivkin, Jr.
David B. Rivkin, Jr., is an attorney with the Washington, D.C., office of Baker & McKenzie. He has published widely on defense and foreign policy matters

        In the aftermath of the Iran-Contra congressional hearings, the legal issues surrounding the executive branch's policies have assumed overriding importance.
       
        It has now become an article of faith that laws were broken in the process of steering private and third-party support to the Nicaraguan freedom fighters and in the selling of arms to Iran. Specifically, it is posited that the Iranian arms sales were carried out in a way that violated the statutory prescriptions dealing with intelligence oversight, as well as the Arms Export Control Act. The support for the Contras effected through Lt. Col. Oliver North's "enterprise" is alleged to have run afoul of the third permutation of the Boland amendment (Boland III).
       
        More generally, opponents of the president's policies claim that the failure of the executive branch to consult with Congress, the administration's efforts to carry out policies through private channels, and the falsehoods deliberately proferred by certain administration members, when responding to congressional inquiries, raise profound constitutional concerns. In addition, there have been allegations that various participants in the Iran-Contra affair may have violated the Neutrality Act and committed sundry crimes ranging from defrauding the government and obstructing justice to conspiring to violate as yet unspecified laws.
       
        Overall, the whole affair has turned into a lawyer's dream. Indeed, rightly or wrongly, technical legality seems to have become a major litmus test by which to judge the acceptability of any foreign policy venture. Unfortunately, most of the legal arguments used to attack the administration are ... (1996 of 29166 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy