The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Psychiatry and the Family: A Historical Perspective


Article # : 13157 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 11 / 1987  5,997 Words
Author : Ian Dowbiggin
Ian Dowbiggin is professor of the faculty of education at the University of Western Ontario.

       During the last quarter-century many writers have begun to challenge the legitimacy of the medical profession in general, and psychiatry in particular. Among these are thinkers such as Ivan Illich, Christopher Lasch, Michael Foucault, R.D. Laing, and Thomas Szasz. Although they disagree on some points, they all agree that the medicalization of society in the last 150 years has not improved public health. They concur that Western nation-states have given physicians unwarranted political, social, and moral authority to intervene in our personal lives and the lives of our families. They further maintain that with its growing influence and power, medicine has steadily eroded our autonomy and self-reliance, encouraging us to depend on supposed experts to organize and manage our lives. This dependence on state-employed professionals has left the public vulnerable to state control of those elements in society deemed to be dangerous to the political order and established elites. Critics like Lasch, Illich, Foucault, and Jacques Donzelot conclude that medicine--and especially psychiatry--has been less concerned with the cure of disease than with political control.
       
        This thesis regarding psychiatry's social role appears confirmed by historical evidence. Historians of medicine since the 1960s have increasingly focused on psychiatry's past, discovering that state-backed psychiatrists have urged families to obey them, although their professional claims to expert knowledge about family heath have often been questionable. In fact, the social mandate granted to psychiatry by the state ahs expanded. This has largely come about because psychiatrists have tried to depict themselves as indispensable in the ongoing struggle to reduce the incidence of mental disease. Because psychiatrists have rarely been able to cure their patients, the task of ... (1997 of 39543 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy