|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Is Hong Kong Down for the Count?
| Article
# : |
13439 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
9 / 1987 |
2,206 Words |
| Author
: |
Steven W. Mosher
Steven W. Mosher is director of the Asian Studies Center at
the Claremont Institute. |
Hong Kong is an anomaly, along with Macao the last of the foreign enclaves that once dotted China's coasts. It is also an anachronism, the last important colonial possession of a British Empire over which the sun has long since set. Time has run out on British rule, for in 1997 the territory of Hong Kong will revert to China. What kind of government will replace the light and even-handed administration of the Brits is uncertain.
Were Hong Kong still the "barren rock with hardly a house upon it" scoffed at by Lord Palmerston 150 years ago, the question of governance would be of little moment; however, the coastal island and adjacent peninsula that the Ching court ceded to Great Britain so long ago have grown into one of the world's great cities, a metropolis of about six million people who enjoy a standard of living comparable to that of Europe.
The linchpin of Hong Kong's success has been the character of its people. For the most part Cantonese immigrants from the adjacent province of Kwangtung, they brought with them a love of education and strong families, plus good business sense and a Confucian work ethic. The British, for their part, provided two essential preconditions for growth: The level playing field of English common law, and a noninterventionist administration under which laissez-faire capitalism, the greatest engine of economic growth known to man, flourished. The fiercely irredentist Chinese Communist Party contributed nothing - and everything - to Hong Kong's growth by simply leaving it alone. Though mightily tempted after 1949 to "liberate" Hong Kong from the clutches of imperialism and capitalism, it stayed its
... (1901 of 12824 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
