|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
The Lessons of Arms Control Negotiations
| Article
# : |
13448 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
9 / 1987 |
3,068 Words |
| Author
: |
James T. Hackett
James T. Hackett is a California-based defense consultant and
a member of the president's General Advisory Committee on Arms
Control. |
Historian Bernard Brodie traces arms control back to 1139, when Pope Innocent II issued an edict banning the use of the crossbow, the terrible new weapon of the 1100s. The pope's arms control edict, however, did not prevent the use of the crossbow and proved no more effective than most of the arms control efforts that have followed.
The first successful U.S. arms control accord was the Rush-Bagot Agreement signed in 1817 with Great Britain, during the administration of President James Monroe. The treaty prohibited fortifications along the Great Lakes, and its success can be seen today in the undefended border between the United States and Canada. Rush-Bagot remains the mot successful arms control agreement the United States ever signed, perhaps because the other part was Britain and not the Soviet Union.
Arms control negotiations usually are undertaken as a reaction to the use of arms or fear of the use of arms. Modern arms control was pursued in earnest after the terrible ordeal of trench warfare in World War I, which saw the extensive use of machine guns, tanks, poison gas, and an enormous loss of life. The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, forced disarmament on a defeated Germany. It reduced the German army to the size of Belgium's and prohibited Germany from developing a navy or an air force - and it was an abject failure.
In 1941, just 22 years after the Treaty of Versailles prohibited German rearmament, the Wehrmacht, with 106 combat divisions, and the Luftwaffe, with the world's best combat aircraft, swept across Europe and into Paris in five weeks. Imposing arms limitations on a defeated enemy and then failing to
... (1994 of 18802 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
