The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

A European Perspective


Article # : 13450 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1987  2,826 Words
Author : Lord Chalfont
Lord Chalfont is chairman of the House of Lords All-Party Defense Group and of the European Atlantic Group. A former military officer, he served as defense correspondent and columnist for the Times of London and has wide experience in government and diplomacy as well as journalism.

       The arms control proposals on intermediate range nuclear forces (INF) now being considered by the United States and the Soviet Union contain long-term dangers to world peace. They have reached the negotiating table mainly because the two superpowers need, for different reasons of their own, a conspicuous and early success in the "arms control" process. The danger is that in striving for short-term success they might be prepared to sacrifice the long-term stability of the international structure. It is therefore important to reexamine some basic principles.
       
        A totally disarmed world is a dream world - possibly desirable, but almost certainly unattainable. Yet it is right that disarmament should be among the long-term aims of all civilized governments, if only because the pursuit of peace has a moderating influence on international behavior. Both the Soviet Union and the United States submitted draft proposals for general and complete disarmament (GCD) to the Geneva Disarmament Committee nearly 30 years ago. For a while they were discussed with every appearance of seriousness, until it became clear that neither side took them seriously at all. As long as East and West faced each other across a deep gulf of suspicion, mistrust, and misunderstanding, real disarmament was obviously out of the question.
       
        The countries represented on the Disarmament Committee therefore decided to concentrate on what were at first known as "partial measures of disarmament" but that later came to be described as "arms control." The idea was to seek agreement on measures that would make war between the great powers less likely and, if it happened, to limit its capacity for devastation. As a result, a number of treaties were signed. In 1963 the ... (1993 of 17011 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy