The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

What Does the ABM Treaty Really Say?


Article # : 13451 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1987  4,265 Words
Author : Mortan A. Kaplan
Morton A. Kaplan is Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and editor and publisher of The World & I.

       There is a major dispute between the Reagan administration and the majority of the U.S. Senate over whether the ABM Treaty excludes the testing - other than in a fixed, land-based mode - and development of ABM systems, or components thereof, employing other physical principles. There is also a debate over whether the president has the right to interpret the treaty contrary to the terms explained to the Senate when it ratified the treaty. I shall show that the ABM Treaty does not forbid the testing and development of ABM systems or components based on other physical principles, and that in clear and convincing language - indeed, beyond a reasonable doubt - Agreed Statement D permits their testing and deployment.
       
        I shall show that Agreed Statement D is so expertly crafted, precisely worded, and completely consistent and coherent that no interpretation other than the one I offer can reasonably be placed upon it. I shall also show why the president is not bound to adhere to the interpretation of the treaty at the time it was ratified.
       
        A treaty is a particular type of contract. Unlike the system of private international law, where a particular municipal code may be singled out as governing, treaties are part of public international law between sovereign states. The rules of municipal interpretation of each party therefore are of relevance in the interpretation of a treaty.
       
        A treaty usually has more than one authoritative language version. Although it is usually possible to find satisfactory legal expressions in different languages, languages rarely can be translated exactly. Where the language texts differ, a party cannot be held to ... (1997 of 25197 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy