The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Introduction: The French Revolution Reconsidered


Article # : 13463 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 9 / 1987  529 Words
Author : Editor

       In the September issue the Modern Thought section includes several pieces devoted to the French Revolution. Seymour Drescher's study of Alexis de Tocqueville as an analyst of the Revolution and Bernard Mitjavile's extended interview with Pierre Chaunu, together with the accompanying sidebars, illustrate the debate still associated with France's great national upheaval. The discussions of the Revolution underscore three key points. First, the French Revolution has become in the popular mind and among scholars, inextricably tied with later social and political upheavals, most importantly the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Second, the growing disenchantment with Soviet communism, evident far more within the French intellectual community than among American academics, has engendered in France a growing distaste for its own revolutionary heritage, seen as coextensive with repression and violence. The Revolution from 1789 on is shown in the writings of Pierre Chaunu and Francois Furet as carrying the seeds of tyranny. The persecution of Catholics and the general use of terror against declared enemies of the state, which became prevalent by 1793, are treated as tendencies of the Revolution already present from the outset.
       
        Third, the new antirevolutionary historiography, unlike antirevolutionary polemics of the last century, has not originated from the old Right but from among anglophile defenders of political liberty. Up until the post-World War II period, Frenchmen who denounced the Revolution were predominantly monarchists or members of the Catholic Right. The attack on the Revolution was symptomatic of an anti-modernist outlook that often went hand in hand with hostility to capitalism, parliamentary government, and the brutal disestablishment of the church in early twentieth-century France. The new critical historiography of the ... (2000 of 3515 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy