The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Coping With Super Militarists


Article # : 14532 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 3 / 1988  1,934 Words
Author : James L. Payne
James L. Payne, currently a visiting scholar at the Social Philosophy Center, Bowling Green State University, has taught political science at Yale, Wesleyan, Johns Hopkins, and Texas A & M. This article is based on his forthcoming book, Why Nations Arm.

       What leads nations to reach eagerly for military might? In the West, where combating militarism has been a crusade for generations, this question identifies a central foreign policy concern. Unfortunately, a faulty diagnosis has left policymakers without a sound way of responding to the problem.
       
        The first principle of disease control is to localize the illness, to find out who has it and who doesn't. The prevailing approach to the study of militarism avoids making this determination. Militarism is held to be a "world" problem, a diffuse malady that taints all countries--and perhaps Western countries more than the rest. The way to "solve" the problem of excessive military preparations thus becomes, first, to urge everyone, especially ourselves, to cut back on armaments, and secondly, to place our trust in international "arms control" agreements.
       
        A study of the facts of militarism shows how misguided this view is. All countries do not acquire military forces at an equal rate. Two particular types of countries stand out. These are nations that emphasize violence in their affairs and are, overwhelmingly, the main source of fighting and bloodshed in the world today. These cultures of war are, first, the Marxist-Leninist regimes and, second, the nations with strong Muslim traditions.
       
        Force ratios
       
        This conclusion is supported by a number of measures of militarism. Perhaps the best indicator of a nation's commitment to military power is its "force ratio," the number of full-time regular military personnel per 1,000 population. This number not only ... (1999 of 11500 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy