The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Will the INF Treaty Reduce the Danger of War?: It Will Weaken NATO Solidarity


Article # : 14534 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 3 / 1988  2,512 Words
Author : Werner Kaltefleiter
Werner Kaltefleiter is director of the Institute of Political Science at Christian-Albrechts University in Kiel, West Germany.

       The year 1987 has been called the "year of disarmament" by West German Chancellor Kohl. These are remarkable words, but they seem justified in view of the conclusion of the agreemend regarding short- and intermediate-range missiles. The hopes and arguments of those in favor of the agreement justifiably point to the fact that the treaty contains three new elements unknown to any previous arms control agreement between the United States and the Soviet Union.
       
        For the first time, a treaty actually includes the reduction of weapons; previous SALT agreements simply froze the number of single-weapon systems at a certain level. Furthermore, for the first time, a whole category of weapons, namely those with ranges between 500 and 5,000 kilometers (km), will be abolished. Thirdly, never before has an agreement meant that--at least at first glance--Soviet concessions would be greater: The Soviet Union will have to dismantle more than 1,000 systems, while only 316 will be done away with on the American side. Even if the 72 Pershing IAs of West Germany were included, the number of systems concerned on the Western side would be slightly below 400, which would mean a ratio of 2.5 to 1.
       
        Significant changes have also been made in the process of verification: For the first time, on-site inspections have been agreed to over a period of 13 years.
       
        Nevertheless, are these new elements reason enough for German and world public opinion to welcome the agreement enthusiastically? In fact, they seem of only superficial importance. The key question is not whether there are more or fewer weapons; what is important are the repercussions this would have for the ... (1993 of 15370 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy