The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Stability and Strategic Defense


Article # : 13554 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 4 / 1988  3,440 Words
Author : Peter Sharfman
Peter Sharfman directs the International Security and Commerce Program of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, which recently completed a study of new technology for NATO. The views in this essay are his own.

       STRATEGIC DEFENSES AND ARMS CONTROL
       Alvin M. Weinberg and Jack N. Barkenbus, eds.
       New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1988
       236 pp., $12.95
       
       The Reagan administration has set as a major objective replacing the existing strategic nuclear forces (missiles, bombers, and nuclear warheads) with strategic defensive forces. The threat of nuclear attack as a means of deterrence is to be replaced by the ability to shoot down the attacking weapons before they reach their targets. President Reagan's 1983 "Star Wars" speech set the agenda for the strategic defense initiative (SDI), a research and technology development program designed to lead to a deployable system for defending against nuclear ballistic missiles. The president's support for arms control agreements to reduce strategic nuclear weapons became more intense and more credible as it was realized that the ultimate goal of SDI--protection of the American population against nuclear missile attacks--would be far less remote if the Soviets agreed to reduce the number of missiles that the future defensive system would attempt to shoot down.
       
       There is considerable ambiguity--and political controversy as well--about how these long-term objectives translate into short-term objectives. While the long-term goal of SDI is an effective defense of the entire United States against even a determined Soviet attack, the initial phases of a deployed system would "enhance" deterrence rather than replace deterrence. While an effective defense against ballistic missiles would need to be complemented by an effective defense against bomber and cruise missiles, work on ... (1996 of 21454 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy