The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Chile: A Crucial Year


Article # : 13590 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1988  1,303 Words
Author : Oscar Godoy-Arcaya
Oscar Godoy-Arcaya is director of the Institute of Political Science of Catholic University of Chile and a member of Chile's Academy of Social Sciences.

       The year 1988 is crucial for Chile's return to democracy. The constitution calls for a plebiscite to be held before the end of the year, beginning the process of electing a president.
       
        For the realization of this event, two electoral bodies will function: one restrictive, composed of the four supreme commanders of the armed forces (army, navy, air force, and police), whose function is to designate the candidate who will be the object of the plebiscite; and the other broad, including all registered Chilean voters, whose number it is hoped will reach about 6.5 million. The citizens must accept (si) or reject (no) the person nominated.
       
        The government will presumably hold the plebiscite at a time most favorable to itself. It is likely that it will set the date in August and call the plebiscite for September.
       
        During the past year, the opposition proposed that open and competitive elections be substituted for the plebiscite. But Gen. Augusto Pinochet's government rejected this demand, arguing that elections involve the classical, democratic method of electing persons to representative public office, while a plebiscite does not allow a choice among many persons. Despite much discussion revolving around these issues, the regime would not relent. In short, Pinochet considers it unwise to open a competitive race for power, at least during this step along the way from his authoritarian government to a democracy.
       
        Several opposition members finally accepted the rules of the game imposed by the military regime and not only agreed to tolerate the legal ... (1994 of 8083 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy