|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Why Bother to Have a Stock Market?
| Article
# : |
13592 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
4 / 1988 |
2,937 Words |
| Author
: |
Ben Stein
Ben Stein is a writer, lawyer, economist, and actor living in
Malibu, California. |
Nicholas Brady does not look like a revolutionary. He looks like the patrician, thoughtful gent he is, a cross between a law professor and a yachtsman.
Nevertheless, the document that bears his name is in fact a thoroughly revolutionary, radical, iconoclastic document. The Brady Commission Report on the causes and cures of the October 19, 1987, crash may not make radical proposals. But in its explanation of just what moved the market on that dark Monday, it challenges the most basic assumptions of how a free market system works, and just what financial markets do and are good for.
Stripped to its essentials, the commission report says that there were a number of exogenous factors that unsettled the market in the week before the crash.
These factors included continuing concern about the Reagan budget deficits, a seemingly intractable and large foreign trade deficit, and a committee draft of a revenue bill that would have complicated and hindered corporate takeovers.
However, the commission report makes clear that these were not overnight news flashes. Unsettling disturbances had been developing for months, and in some cases for decades. Besides, even collectively, these outside pieces of data were at most curtain raisers for the Big Event.
An economic Chernobyl
What caused the "near meltdown," to borrow New York Stock Exchange Chairman John Phelan's neat
... (1999 of 17236 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
