|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Introduction: Art in Crisis
| Article
# : |
13779 |
|
|
Section : |
THE ARTS
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1988 |
1,298 Words |
| Author
: |
Cynthia Grenier
Cynthia Grenier is contributing editor to the Arts section of
The World & I. |
Art is in a state of crisis at the present, as it has been for many decades. We thought that for this, our first special section devoted to art, we would ask a number of distinguished art critics and historians to look back over the centuries to target the manifold sources of this crisis. We asked them to attempt to project into the future, even as we stand poised on the threshold of the third millennium, to see where the creative world could be headed.
It seemed particularly appropriate, then, to open our special section, Art in Crisis, with an essay by Umberto Eco on the theory of art in the Middle Ages. Art, Eco tells us, belonged to the realm of making, not doing. Art was viewed as construction, not as the expression of an individual's feelings. A theory of art was a theory of craftsmanship.
The maker, the creator, was an artifex. The word applied as well to a blacksmith or a sheepshearer as to a poet or a painter. For the Medievals, art at best produced beautiful images—images that existed only by virtue of the material that sustained them, whereas natural objects existed by virtue of divine participation. The governing word here is divine.
Life in the Middle Ages may have been short, brutal, and nasty for blacksmith and artist and sheepshearer alike, but there was no conflict as to what the artifex's role was in society. This was a time when there were no disaffected or alienated artists.
The first intimations of a divergence between the world of the arts and society at large can perhaps be traced to the early years of the fifteenth
... (1994 of 7658 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
