|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Fidel Castro: A Socialist Caudillo
| Article
# : |
13847 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1988 |
1,891 Words |
| Author
: |
Luis E. Aguilar
Luis E. Aguilar is professor of history at Georgetown
University. |
If, as Engels wrote, the masses are the only real heroes in history and individual "heroes" simply those who fulfill the will of the masses, how can we explain the impact of Napoleon and Lenin on French and Russian history? Or why, after every socialist revolution, has a single omnipotent dictator—Stalin, Mao, Tito, and Castro—reached power?
Fidel Castro may be Marxism's greatest dilemma. After 30 years in power and several proclamations of "institutionalizing" the revolution, he remains the undisputed "maximum leader." In neither foreign nor national affairs has he relinquished an ounce of control. Castro appears as the archetypal Latin American caudillo, one who rules by personal appeal rather than ideological programs, challenging the Marxist concept of socialist leadership. The more we understand the man, the better we can deal with him.
Castro's history is well known. The problem, as usual, is how to interpret it. Favorable biographers tend to gloss over his juvenile violence (he participated in the "gangster" struggles at Havana University) and stress his idealism. Unfavorable analysts dismiss his personal courage to focus on his cruelty and duplicity. Castro is thus either a great hero with some faults or a base scoundrel with some virtues. Curiously, most interpreters give the masses a minor role in Castro's Cuba.
Castro was born and raised in Biran, a small rural town in northern Oriente Province. His father, a tough land-grabbing Spaniard, detested the United States and lived in primitive conditions. One early visitor to Castro's home remarked that he had never seen "a book, a painting, or a flower" in that house. Educated
... (2000 of 11979 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
